<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="https://publishpress.com/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Openssl 3.x and Legacy Providers	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.practicalnetworking.net/practical-tls/openssl-3-and-legacy-providers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/practical-tls/openssl-3-and-legacy-providers/</link>
	<description>Networking presented simply, practically, and applicably</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:46:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Davis		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/practical-tls/openssl-3-and-legacy-providers/#comment-256278</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=3360#comment-256278</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Power management in &lt;a href=&quot;https://fnaffreddy.io&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noopener nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;Fnaf&lt;/a&gt; creates a constant sense of dread throughout the night. Every action you take consumes energy and brings you closer to vulnerability. You must constantly ask yourself whether a camera check is worth the cost.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Power management in <a href="https://fnaffreddy.io" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow ugc">Fnaf</a> creates a constant sense of dread throughout the night. Every action you take consumes energy and brings you closer to vulnerability. You must constantly ask yourself whether a camera check is worth the cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Study4Pass		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/practical-tls/openssl-3-and-legacy-providers/#comment-256267</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Study4Pass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 05:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=3360#comment-256267</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is a great troubleshooting reference for anyone working through Network+ or CCNA crypto objectives — the RC2-40-CBC error is a perfect example of how a legacy algorithm quietly breaks a workflow after an upgrade, not because anything was misconfigured, but because the provider architecture changed the defaults.
A tip worth remembering for exams: &quot;openssl list -providers&quot; is your first verification step, and enabling the legacy provider in openssl.cnf (rather than just -provider legacy on the command line) is the permanent fix.
Question: has anyone run into a case where even with both providers activated, pkcs12 still failed — for example when the PFX itself was generated with an even older cipher like DES-CBC?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great troubleshooting reference for anyone working through Network+ or CCNA crypto objectives — the RC2-40-CBC error is a perfect example of how a legacy algorithm quietly breaks a workflow after an upgrade, not because anything was misconfigured, but because the provider architecture changed the defaults.<br />
A tip worth remembering for exams: &#8220;openssl list -providers&#8221; is your first verification step, and enabling the legacy provider in openssl.cnf (rather than just -provider legacy on the command line) is the permanent fix.<br />
Question: has anyone run into a case where even with both providers activated, pkcs12 still failed — for example when the PFX itself was generated with an even older cipher like DES-CBC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Clark		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/practical-tls/openssl-3-and-legacy-providers/#comment-256259</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 07:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=3360#comment-256259</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s crazy how many legacy PFX files break after updating to &lt;a href=&quot;https://whyinfluencersgonewild.co.uk/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noopener nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;OpenSSL 3.0&lt;/a&gt; because it disables RC2-40-CBC by default. Enabling both the default and legacy providers in the configuration file saves so much time compared to adding flags to every command.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s crazy how many legacy PFX files break after updating to <a href="https://whyinfluencersgonewild.co.uk/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow ugc">OpenSSL 3.0</a> because it disables RC2-40-CBC by default. Enabling both the default and legacy providers in the configuration file saves so much time compared to adding flags to every command.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Felix Andrea		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/practical-tls/openssl-3-and-legacy-providers/#comment-256239</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Felix Andrea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 04:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=3360#comment-256239</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;span&gt;Good explanation—OpenSSL 3’s provider model is exactly why older PFX/PEM files can fail. Enabling both &lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;default&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span&gt; and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;legacy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span&gt; providers in &lt;/span&gt;&lt;code&gt;openssl.cnf&lt;/code&gt;&lt;span&gt; is a clean permanent &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://heardleonline.io/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noopener nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;heardle game&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; fix. Thank you so much.&lt;/span&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Good explanation—OpenSSL 3’s provider model is exactly why older PFX/PEM files can fail. Enabling both </span><strong>default</strong><span> and </span><strong>legacy</strong><span> providers in </span><code>openssl.cnf</code><span> is a clean permanent </span><a href="https://heardleonline.io/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow ugc">heardle game</a><span> fix. Thank you so much.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: towardswave		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/practical-tls/openssl-3-and-legacy-providers/#comment-255934</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[towardswave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 01:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=3360#comment-255934</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As a result, players experience a satisfying &lt;a href=&quot;https://spacewaves-2.io/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noopener nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;space waves 2&lt;/a&gt; gameplay loop where they can actually feel their talents getting better over time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a result, players experience a satisfying <a href="https://spacewaves-2.io/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow ugc">space waves 2</a> gameplay loop where they can actually feel their talents getting better over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CgX		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/practical-tls/openssl-3-and-legacy-providers/#comment-255784</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CgX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 15:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=3360#comment-255784</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.practicalnetworking.net/practical-tls/openssl-3-and-legacy-providers/#comment-255015&quot;&gt;Abdul&lt;/a&gt;.

From my side, I also uncommented this section : 

[openssl_init]
providers = provider_sect


And now it&#039;s working !]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.practicalnetworking.net/practical-tls/openssl-3-and-legacy-providers/#comment-255015">Abdul</a>.</p>
<p>From my side, I also uncommented this section : </p>
<p>[openssl_init]<br />
providers = provider_sect</p>
<p>And now it&#8217;s working !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Abdul		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/practical-tls/openssl-3-and-legacy-providers/#comment-255015</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abdul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 14:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=3360#comment-255015</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.practicalnetworking.net/practical-tls/openssl-3-and-legacy-providers/#comment-254807&quot;&gt;Greg&lt;/a&gt;.

for me same issue , after doing the above changes the &lt;span&gt;provider &lt;/span&gt;list same.
 
Providers:
&#160;default
&#160;&#160;name: OpenSSL Default Provider
&#160;&#160;version: 3.5.0
&#160;&#160;status: active]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.practicalnetworking.net/practical-tls/openssl-3-and-legacy-providers/#comment-254807">Greg</a>.</p>
<p>for me same issue , after doing the above changes the <span>provider </span>list same.</p>
<p>Providers:<br />
&nbsp;default<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;name: OpenSSL Default Provider<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;version: 3.5.0<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;status: active</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ADA		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/practical-tls/openssl-3-and-legacy-providers/#comment-254961</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ADA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 17:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=3360#comment-254961</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[thank you so much for this. this solved my problem]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you so much for this. this solved my problem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rex		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/practical-tls/openssl-3-and-legacy-providers/#comment-254928</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 07:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=3360#comment-254928</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excelente, muy bien explicado, muchisimas gracias.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excelente, muy bien explicado, muchisimas gracias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/practical-tls/openssl-3-and-legacy-providers/#comment-254807</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 17:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=3360#comment-254807</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.practicalnetworking.net/practical-tls/openssl-3-and-legacy-providers/#comment-254334&quot;&gt;bgmcoder&lt;/a&gt;.

you ever figure out why?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.practicalnetworking.net/practical-tls/openssl-3-and-legacy-providers/#comment-254334">bgmcoder</a>.</p>
<p>you ever figure out why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
