<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="https://publishpress.com/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Host to Host Communication	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/</link>
	<description>Networking presented simply, practically, and applicably</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 18:20:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ed Harmoush		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-254241</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Harmoush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 18:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=628#comment-254241</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-254238&quot;&gt;smiley&lt;/a&gt;.

&#062; &lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(119, 119, 119);&quot;&gt;&#160;is it just a case of both ip addresses being within the same subnet defined by the netmask associated with the sending interface&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(119, 119, 119);&quot;&gt;Yes, 100% =)  The sending device is using their own IP/Subnet Mask to determine which target hosts are &quot;within the network&quot; and which are on &quot;external networks&quot;.&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(119, 119, 119);&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;ql-cursor&quot;&gt;﻿&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-254238">smiley</a>.</p>
<p>&gt; <span style="color: rgb(119, 119, 119);">&nbsp;is it just a case of both ip addresses being within the same subnet defined by the netmask associated with the sending interface</span></p>
<p><span style="color: rgb(119, 119, 119);">Yes, 100% =)  The sending device is using their own IP/Subnet Mask to determine which target hosts are &#8220;within the network&#8221; and which are on &#8220;external networks&#8221;.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: rgb(119, 119, 119);"><span class="ql-cursor">﻿</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: smiley		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-254238</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smiley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 08:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=628#comment-254238</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Since there are no Routers in this illustration, we know all the communication is happening within the same network.&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;span&gt;Yes we do, but how is that known by the elements involved - is it just a case of both ip addresses being within the same subnet defined by the netmask associated with the sending interface? Though presumably that can get more complicated when two networks are bridged? I&#039;m puzzled how this is resolved in general; ie given a destination ip, what determines if we query ARP for its mac address, or do a lookup in the routing table? &lt;/span&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Since there are no Routers in this illustration, we know all the communication is happening within the same network.</em></p>
<p><span>Yes we do, but how is that known by the elements involved &#8211; is it just a case of both ip addresses being within the same subnet defined by the netmask associated with the sending interface? Though presumably that can get more complicated when two networks are bridged? I&#8217;m puzzled how this is resolved in general; ie given a destination ip, what determines if we query ARP for its mac address, or do a lookup in the routing table? </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ed Harmoush		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-254159</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Harmoush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 20:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=628#comment-254159</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-254151&quot;&gt;Bone&lt;/a&gt;.

You&#039;re welcome =)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-254151">Bone</a>.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re welcome =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bone		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-254151</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2022 20:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=628#comment-254151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great work sir.
Thank you very much.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work sir.<br />
Thank you very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ed Harmoush		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-253987</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Harmoush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 17:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=628#comment-253987</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-253952&quot;&gt;Raveen&lt;/a&gt;.

Glad you enjoyed it!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-253952">Raveen</a>.</p>
<p>Glad you enjoyed it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Raveen		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-253952</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raveen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2022 08:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=628#comment-253952</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Explanation is really great]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Explanation is really great</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daivid		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-243521</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daivid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=628#comment-243521</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-243491&quot;&gt;Ed Harmoush&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you very much for responding. I learn a lot from your articles. Amazing didactics.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-243491">Ed Harmoush</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you very much for responding. I learn a lot from your articles. Amazing didactics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ed Harmoush		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-243491</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Harmoush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=628#comment-243491</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-243490&quot;&gt;Daivid&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes, mostly. Home Routers are just simple L3 devices.

But more and more the home routers come with additional features. Things like a UI you can log into and change settings or see who is connected, etc. Those elements would be considered &quot;applications&quot;, meaning that particular home Router operates at layer 7.

Remember, &quot;Routing&quot; is simply the function of moving packets between networks -- this is a purely Layer 3 task. A &quot;Router&quot; as we know it is a device who&#039;s primary purpose is Routing, &lt;em&gt;but not it&#039;s only purpose&lt;/em&gt;. Some of those &lt;em&gt;other&lt;/em&gt; purposes might require the Router to operate &quot;above&quot; Layer 3.  Hope this helps.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-243490">Daivid</a>.</p>
<p>Yes, mostly. Home Routers are just simple L3 devices.</p>
<p>But more and more the home routers come with additional features. Things like a UI you can log into and change settings or see who is connected, etc. Those elements would be considered &#8220;applications&#8221;, meaning that particular home Router operates at layer 7.</p>
<p>Remember, &#8220;Routing&#8221; is simply the function of moving packets between networks &#8212; this is a purely Layer 3 task. A &#8220;Router&#8221; as we know it is a device who&#8217;s primary purpose is Routing, <em>but not it&#8217;s only purpose</em>. Some of those <em>other</em> purposes might require the Router to operate &#8220;above&#8221; Layer 3.  Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daivid		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-243490</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daivid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=628#comment-243490</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-243259&quot;&gt;Ed Harmoush&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes, I forgot to mention in the question that it is a Windows Server computer as a Gateway. In the case of a &quot;Standard Gateway - Home Router&quot; does it operate only at the network layer as you said correct?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-243259">Ed Harmoush</a>.</p>
<p>Yes, I forgot to mention in the question that it is a Windows Server computer as a Gateway. In the case of a &#8220;Standard Gateway &#8211; Home Router&#8221; does it operate only at the network layer as you said correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ed Harmoush		</title>
		<link>https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-243259</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Harmoush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 17:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.practicalnetworking.net/?p=628#comment-243259</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-242522&quot;&gt;Daivid&lt;/a&gt;.

You could say that, yes. But keep in mind the computer also can use TCP or UDP, and various network applications. So typically it&#039;s considered that PC&#039;s operate at all layers of the OSI model.

As for Gateways, it depends what you mean by it.  If you mean application layer gateways, then yes, they operate on all layers. If you simply mean &quot;gateway&quot; as in &quot;default gateway&quot; i.e., nearest Router, then no, Routers operate up to Layer 3.

But keep in mind, these aren&#039;t strict rules. See the end of this video for more details:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aGqGKrRE0g]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.practicalnetworking.net/series/packet-traveling/host-to-host/#comment-242522">Daivid</a>.</p>
<p>You could say that, yes. But keep in mind the computer also can use TCP or UDP, and various network applications. So typically it&#8217;s considered that PC&#8217;s operate at all layers of the OSI model.</p>
<p>As for Gateways, it depends what you mean by it.  If you mean application layer gateways, then yes, they operate on all layers. If you simply mean &#8220;gateway&#8221; as in &#8220;default gateway&#8221; i.e., nearest Router, then no, Routers operate up to Layer 3.</p>
<p>But keep in mind, these aren&#8217;t strict rules. See the end of this video for more details:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aGqGKrRE0g" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aGqGKrRE0g</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
